diff options
author | Viktor Kleen <viktor@kleen.org> | 2015-03-03 05:55:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Viktor Kleen <viktor@kleen.org> | 2015-03-03 05:55:33 +0000 |
commit | f81be5dfb7720994f6deca3bc738c63f48f26309 (patch) | |
tree | 9faff874354ca64e8e0b711fea816645ed58334b /posts | |
parent | 8648faa6c224be177461fc7e93155ceabf8f6ca5 (diff) | |
download | dirty-haskell.org-f81be5dfb7720994f6deca3bc738c63f48f26309.tar dirty-haskell.org-f81be5dfb7720994f6deca3bc738c63f48f26309.tar.gz dirty-haskell.org-f81be5dfb7720994f6deca3bc738c63f48f26309.tar.bz2 dirty-haskell.org-f81be5dfb7720994f6deca3bc738c63f48f26309.tar.xz dirty-haskell.org-f81be5dfb7720994f6deca3bc738c63f48f26309.zip |
start writing on torsors
Diffstat (limited to 'posts')
-rw-r--r-- | posts/torsors.md | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/posts/torsors.md b/posts/torsors.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..22bf7af --- /dev/null +++ b/posts/torsors.md | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ | |||
1 | % Torsors and Their Classification | ||
2 | |||
3 | Let $\ca C$ be some Grothendieck topos, that is a category of sheaves on some | ||
4 | Grothendieck topology. This text will look at some properties of *torsors* in | ||
5 | $\ca C$ and how they might be classified using cohomology and homotopy | ||
6 | theory. For this we will first need to define group objects. Torsors will then | ||
7 | be associated to those. | ||
8 | |||
9 | <defn> A *group object* in a category $\ca C$ is an object $G\in\ca C$ such that | ||
10 | the associated Yoneda functor $\hom(\_,G)\colon \op{\ca C}\to\Set$ actually | ||
11 | takes values in the category $\Grp$ of groups. </defn> | ||
12 | |||
13 | A trivial kind of example would be just a group considered as an object in | ||
14 | $\Set$. A more involved example would be a *group scheme* $G$ over some base | ||
15 | $S$. Such a thing is essentially defined as a group object in the category | ||
16 | $\sch[S]$. If we have any subcanonical topology on $\sch[S]$, then $G$ defines a | ||
17 | sheaf on the associated site and we obtain in this way a group object in the | ||
18 | corresponding topos on $S$. | ||
19 | |||
20 | Let's now assume we have a group object $G$ in a Grothendieck topos $\ca | ||
21 | C$. Then we can define torsors over $G$ as follows: | ||
22 | |||
23 | <defn> A *trivial torsor* over $G$ is an object $X$ with a left $G$--action | ||
24 | which is isomorphic to $G$ itself with the action given by left | ||
25 | multiplication. A *torsor* over $G$ is an object $X\in\ca C$ with a left | ||
26 | $G$--action which is locally isomorphic to a trivial torsor; that is, there is | ||
27 | an epimorphism $U\to *$ such that $U\times X$ is a trivial torsor in $\ca C/U$ | ||
28 | over $U \times G$. </defn> | ||